The Mind Is Nothing but a Cloud
Talk #6 from The Original Man
In stock
"Anando, before we discuss Manzan and his statements – a few necessary things.
"One is the word mind…
"In Sanskrit, there are two words: one is man from which the English words mind and man..."
"One is the word mind…
"In Sanskrit, there are two words: one is man from which the English words mind and man..."
Details
"Anando, before we discuss Manzan and his statements – a few necessary things.
"One is the word mind…
"In Sanskrit, there are two words: one is man from which the English words mind and man..."
Osho continues:
"One is the word mind…
"In Sanskrit, there are two words: one is man from which the English words mind and man..."
"And wherever chit, the universal consciousness, is concerned, he uses mind with a capital M.
"In writing, it is perfectly good; in reading, it becomes more difficult. Whether the M is a capital or a small M, in both cases you are going to call it 'mind.'
"So remember, all the time he is using mind…I will remind you when it is a capital M and when it is a small M. You have the small-M mind, a dewdrop of the universal Mind. When this dewdrop disappears in the ocean, it becomes a capital-M Mind. It is no longer yours, it is nobody. It is simply the universal, existential, awareness. It does not belong to anybody, it is nobody's possession.
"Secondly, it has always been a difficult process for an enlightened man to bring his experience into language. Everybody falters. It is not the person's fault; the very process is one of trying to do the impossible. The experience of the universal consciousness is so far away from language that when you drag it down to language, it becomes something else. Then it can have many interpretations.
"Your experience was one, absolutely singular, absolutely clear. There was no question of any alternative meaning or any interference. But when you bring it down to the level of language, then thousands of problems arise.
"You have to remember the difficulty of the enlightened man, and you have to be compassionate, because our language is so poor that it cannot contain things of the beyond.
"For example, Krishna's Shrimad Bhagavadgita has one thousand interpretations. Now, either Krishna was so mad that he would speak words with one thousand meanings…A word with one thousand meanings means nothing! And those meanings are contradictory to each other. But in bringing them to language, they become vulnerable. There are one thousand great commentaries on Krishna's Gita, and they all condemn each other. They all project their own mind – and they are free, because Krishna is not there to interrupt, to say, 'This is not my meaning.'
"A word can have many meanings. Particularly older languages – Sanskrit, Greek, Hebrew, Arabic – have a beauty but also a difficulty. Their beauty is that they are very poetic."
"In writing, it is perfectly good; in reading, it becomes more difficult. Whether the M is a capital or a small M, in both cases you are going to call it 'mind.'
"So remember, all the time he is using mind…I will remind you when it is a capital M and when it is a small M. You have the small-M mind, a dewdrop of the universal Mind. When this dewdrop disappears in the ocean, it becomes a capital-M Mind. It is no longer yours, it is nobody. It is simply the universal, existential, awareness. It does not belong to anybody, it is nobody's possession.
"Secondly, it has always been a difficult process for an enlightened man to bring his experience into language. Everybody falters. It is not the person's fault; the very process is one of trying to do the impossible. The experience of the universal consciousness is so far away from language that when you drag it down to language, it becomes something else. Then it can have many interpretations.
"Your experience was one, absolutely singular, absolutely clear. There was no question of any alternative meaning or any interference. But when you bring it down to the level of language, then thousands of problems arise.
"You have to remember the difficulty of the enlightened man, and you have to be compassionate, because our language is so poor that it cannot contain things of the beyond.
"For example, Krishna's Shrimad Bhagavadgita has one thousand interpretations. Now, either Krishna was so mad that he would speak words with one thousand meanings…A word with one thousand meanings means nothing! And those meanings are contradictory to each other. But in bringing them to language, they become vulnerable. There are one thousand great commentaries on Krishna's Gita, and they all condemn each other. They all project their own mind – and they are free, because Krishna is not there to interrupt, to say, 'This is not my meaning.'
"A word can have many meanings. Particularly older languages – Sanskrit, Greek, Hebrew, Arabic – have a beauty but also a difficulty. Their beauty is that they are very poetic."
More Information
| Publisher | Osho International |
|---|---|
| Duration of Talk | 131 mins |
| File Size | 30.31 MB |
| Type | Individual Talks |
| Edition/ Version | 2 |
Please complete your information below to login.
Sign In or Create Account
Create New Account